<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>teppoudo &#187; stance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teppoudo.org/category/stance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teppoudo.org</link>
	<description>Way of the Gun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mastering Fundamental #3</title>
		<link>http://teppoudo.org/25-mastering-fundamental-3</link>
		<comments>http://teppoudo.org/25-mastering-fundamental-3#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sandhu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundamentals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trigger]]></category>
<category>accuracy</category><category>fundamentals</category><category>sight</category><category>stance</category><category>technique</category><category>trigger</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teppoudo.org/25-mastering-fundamental-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following is extracted from various posts by Brian Enos on his forum covering techniques for mastering Fundamental #3.
It&#8217;s important to understand the difference between Sight Alignment and Sight Picture since it is critical to understanding the post below.
The greatest obstacle in shooting a pistol accurately offhand is produced by the movement of the gun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following is extracted from various posts by <a href="http://www.brianenos.com/">Brian Enos</a> on his <a href="http://www.brianenos.com/forums/index.php?act=idx">forum</a> covering techniques for mastering <a href="http://teppoudo.org/3-fundamentals-and-technique">Fundamental #3</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to understand the difference between <a href="http://teppoudo.org/6-sight-alignment-and-sight-picture">Sight Alignment and Sight Picture</a> since it is critical to understanding the post below.</p>
<blockquote><p>The greatest obstacle in shooting a pistol accurately offhand is produced by the movement of the gun in the hand (wobble) combined with the movement of the wobble on the target (hold). These all too observable visual inputs distract us from what is important, the aforementioned third fundamental of shooting &#8211; releasing the shot without disturbing the gun&#8217;s hold.<span id="more-25"></span></p>
<p>This can help: imagine your pistol is in a machine-rest even though you are holding it offhand. Now imagine the target is moving (in the same pattern/manner as your hold). Now, ask yourself &#8211; what can you do?</p>
<p>Knowing this, it&#8217;s best to begin by shooting from a bench rest, or other supported position. Bag your pistol so that it&#8217;s rock solid. Aim into the backstop and then direct ALL your attention to building the pressure on the trigger until the gun fires. After you become comfortable with the feeling of firing the gun with all your attention on the trigger while simply watching the sights lift in recoil, place a target at 25 yards and repeat the above procedure with the following addition: Use this &#8220;order&#8221; to fire the shot:</p>
<ol>
<li>Align your sights in the center of the target.</li>
<li>Shift all your attention to your previous feeling of your finger building pressure on the trigger until the shot breaks.</li>
</ol>
<p>During #2, you are still looking at the sights; however, you are looking in a detached manner. Which means: <strong>Your concern is not in trying to shoot a particular spot; you are simply looking with the intention of remembering where the sights were aligned at the moment the shot fires.</strong></p>
<p>Only after you&#8217;ve mastered &#8220;bench rest calling,&#8221; begin shooting offhand. Again, begin by shooting into the backstop with no intention of hitting anything in particular. This will allow you to focus all your attention on what is important &#8211; &#8220;releasing&#8221; the shot without disturbing the gun&#8217;s hold. Relax your attention into the gun, look at the sights without staring, and then shift all your attention to the previously mastered feeling of your finger on the trigger; with great determination and purpose, increase pressure on the trigger until the gun fires &#8211; &#8220;FEEL&#8221; the shot off. At the moment the gun lifts, recall the sight alignment, again, this is what you must see and remember. After mastering this, when you put a target behind your sights, you simply recall the &#8220;sight picture&#8221; &#8211; (sight alignment plus their relationship to the target).</p>
<p>Now to shoot a &#8220;good shot&#8221; (one that actually goes where you intended it), you must combine the feeling of releasing a perfect shot with the feeling of &#8220;willing the gun still&#8221; as you build pressure on the trigger. Eventually, with training, this becomes ONE FEELING.</p></blockquote>
<p>The following text is extracted from a post on Calling the Shot, but it applies here</p>
<blockquote><p>Once reading the sights is firmly ingrained, practice to preserve this most important of all fundamental while increasing your shooting speed by <strong>projecting your attention into your sights</strong> as you shoot. When you master this, everything else will vanish &#8211; even &#8220;you.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Since Brian tends to choose his words very carefully, the choice of the words &#8220;into your sights&#8221; as opposed to &#8220;onto your sights&#8221; is an interesting one. Brian&#8217;s response in another post provides the subtle difference.</p>
<blockquote><p>I am suggesting a different meaning when I said into vs onto. Into implies a &#8220;deeper&#8221; level of attention in which the &#8220;self&#8221; (the self in this case meaning &#8211; &#8220;someone&#8221; seeing &#8220;something&#8221;) dissolves, and only awareness remains.</p></blockquote>
<p>This Zen approach to shooting reminded me of the following Quote:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>When you do something, you should burn yourself completely, like a good bonfire, leaving no trace of yourself.</em></p>
<p align="right">— Shunryu Suzuki Roshi</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The removal of self from the equation removes or should remove ego from the equation.  The removal of ego leads to the removal of conscious impulse to &#8220;control&#8221; what is happening.</p>
<blockquote><p>First, we should clearly establish what we&#8217;d like to happen (in our mind before we shoot). Then, once the activity begins, it&#8217;s usually beneficial to turn our attention to simply witnessing what is actually happening, thereby allowing our body to manifest the training it has undergone.</p>
<p><strong><em>Trying or thinking of any kind impedes awareness. When one is, the other isn&#8217;t.</em> </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>The post is talking about 2 distinct states of mind that need to be developed and you should only be in 1 state at a given time. Being an &#8220;observer&#8221; as opposed to a &#8220;tryer&#8221; during the execution of a high speed activity is more conducive to success. Wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teppoudo.org/25-mastering-fundamental-3/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stereopsis (Stereo Vision) and shooting</title>
		<link>http://teppoudo.org/13-stereopsis-stereo-vision-and-shooting</link>
		<comments>http://teppoudo.org/13-stereopsis-stereo-vision-and-shooting#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sandhu</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[sight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vision]]></category>
<category>sight</category><category>stance</category><category>technique</category><category>vision</category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teppoudo.org/13-stereopsis-stereo-vision-and-shooting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stereopsis (derived from the greek word stereos meaning solidity, and opsis meaning vision) is the process in visual perception leading to perception of stereoscopic depth.
This is essentially the process where the brain takes the distinct images from each  eye and combines them into an image that is more than the sum of the parts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stereopsis">Stereopsis</a> (derived from the greek word <em>stereos </em>meaning solidity, and <em>opsis </em>meaning vision) is the process in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_perception">visual perception</a> leading to perception of stereoscopic depth.</p>
<p>This is essentially the process where the brain takes the distinct images from each  eye and combines them into an image that is more than the sum of the parts since it is a 3D image which allows the perception of depth.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://teppoudo.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/twoimages.jpg" alt="Stereopsis" /></p>
<p>There is much debate on shooting with one eye vs. shooting with both eyes open. <span id="more-13"></span>The existence of stereo vision makes shooting with both eyes open for many people (including me) very difficult.</p>
<p>The proponents of shooting with both eyes open cite various benefits for doing so. Taking the &#8220;tactical&#8221; reasons out of the equation, there are still a number of reasons presented, some of which are summarized below.</p>
<p>Stereo vision is needed for depth perception, which becomes important when shooting moving targets, especially 360 swingers that need to be rotated. With only one eye open, it becomes hard to figure out whether the paddle is coming towards you or moving away.</p>
<p>Eye fatigue is often sighted as a reason with the claim being that vision deteriorate faster when only one eye is open.</p>
<p>Another reason raised relates to not going against our natural tendency. We tend to do everything with two eyes open, so trying to shoot with only one eye open would not be natural. Even though it&#8217;s not strictly about vision the quote below seems to make some sense in this context.</p>
<blockquote><p>If by nature you do things quickly, or slowly, you&#8217;re going to swing the golf club basically the same way. forcing yourself to an opposite extreme is rarely going to work because its too contrary to your basic instincts or impulses&#8211; especially when your under competitive pressure.</p>
<p align="right">— <a href="http://www.nicklaus.com/">Jack Nicklaus</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Given all the benefits cited, I thought it would be a good idea to at least attempt to teach myself to use both eyes while shooting. I wanted to do it the &#8220;<em>natural</em>&#8221; way, i.e., no tape on the glasses or turning my head to odd angles etc.</p>
<p>The main issue I ran into was related to stereo vision and how the brain combined the images from both eyes.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.vision3d.com/frame.html">framing test</a> is a good illustration of the issue I ran into.</p>
<p>The image below (obtained from a thread the <a href="http://glocktalk.com/showthread.php?s=&amp;threadid=308553">Glock Talk</a>) shows the double images produced because of parallax.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://teppoudo.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/aiming_issue_double_image.jpg" alt="Aiming with both eyes open" height="695" width="470" /></p>
<p>Sometimes the two targets had a big overlap between them and appeared as a blob.</p>
<p>If there is a strong dominance in one eye, that eye will take over and produce a better defined image and the image from the non-dominant eye will appear very faint and can be easily ignored. You can confirm this by squinting (not completely closing) one of your eyes and trying the above test.</p>
<p>In my case, my dominance is not strong, hence I see an image very close to the one above.</p>
<p>Now I know that I need to shoot the target on the right since it&#8217;s the one being picked up with my right eye and I need to use the sights on the left since they are the ones being picked up with my right eye.</p>
<p>This was not an acceptable solution since if nothing else it is a big safety issue. I don&#8217;t want any ambiguity in what I&#8217;m shooting at. Another issue comes up in target arrays with multiple overlapping targets. Essentially it&#8217;s a mess.</p>
<p><strong>In order for this to work at all for me, I needed to see only one target downrange, not a <em>real </em>target and a <em>ghost</em> target.</strong></p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really care that I saw two sets of sights, since my body index made it very easy for my brain to pick up the correct set of sights as the gun came into view. In order to teach myself that, I used the exercises described on pages 170 &amp; 171 of <a href="http://www.brianenos.com/pages/reviews.html#be">Practical Shooting &#8211; Beyond Fundamentals</a> by <a href="http://www.brianenos.com">Brian Enos</a>.</p>
<p>Now if I look for it, I can still see the image of the sights seen by my left eye appear to the right of the set that I&#8217;m using, but if I don&#8217;t explicitly look for them, they don&#8217;t distract me at all and aren&#8217;t there for all practical purposes.</p>
<p>When thinking about the ghost target problem I realized the following. When I focused on the target, I saw only one target. As I moved my focus back to the front sight, the target would get blurry as expected and the <em>ghost </em>target would separate from the <em>real </em>target and move to the left. <strong>The interesting thing was that there was a slight lag between the time I had the front sight in clear focus (with the target blurry) and the time when the <em>ghost </em>target appeared.</strong></p>
<p>This time interval was extremely short, but it was there.</p>
<p>This indicated that the brain was making a decision at some point after I had my clear focus on the front sight to show me both images. Before the two images appeared, the single image was aligned with the sights and my right eye.</p>
<p>If I could stop the brain from proceeding with the creation of the <em>ghost </em>image, my problem would be solved. Incidentally the only reason I am calling it a <em>ghost </em>target is that it&#8217;s not the one I want to shoot at. It&#8217;s simply the image from my left eye and nothing more. It has no special significance</p>
<p>Since I already knew what I wanted to see, and I could visualize it, I consciously tried to slow down the creation of the second image of the target. It took a while, but it started to work. Eventually the second image disappeared completely.</p>
<p>Initially this process seemed to be linked to distance from the target, e.g., I could do it with a target at 10 yards, but a 20 yard target was problematic. After working on it for a bit, distance is no longer an issue. I suspect distance was initially a factor since I was attempting to use depth of field of solve the problem, instead of convincing my brain to image correctly.</p>
<p>Now I see two sets of sights (with one set really easy to ignore) and one target regardless of where I focus. If I switch my focus to the target, I have full depth perception.</p>
<p>When I switch focus back to the front sight, the target stays put. Finally <img src='http://teppoudo.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>All in all this process took me 4 months with a ton of dry practice. I suspect I would be able to do it a lot faster now since I know what I need to do.</p>
<p>I have not noticed any impact on any other activities.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not yet sure if there are any significant advantages to shooting with both eyes open, however I can confidently say that I&#8217;ve noticed no disadvantages for me in the context of IPSC competition and intend to continue shooting this way.</p>
<p>Incidentally eye dominance didn&#8217;t seem to matter. I am cross dominant and haven&#8217;t had any issues after training myself through visualization.</p>
<p><u><strong>Update (April 22, 2007)</strong></u><strong>:</strong> Please refer to the post on <a href="http://teppoudo.org/18-eye-alignment-and-eye-focus">eye alignment and eye focus</a> for further an attempt at an explanation for how I managed to stop the brain from creating the ghost image of the target.</p>
<p><u><strong>Update (April 23, 2007)</strong></u><strong>:</strong> I&#8217;ve added a post describing the <a href="http://teppoudo.org/20-training-to-shoot-with-both-eyes-open">training method</a> I used to learn how to shoot with both eyes open.</p>
<p><u><strong>Update (May 10, 2007):</strong></u> Added the image of the pistol sights above to clarify the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://teppoudo.org/13-stereopsis-stereo-vision-and-shooting/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
